Search Our Essay Database

Essay Instructions: Social Contract

Describe the social responsibilities that the business has as an organization. Include information on how these social responsibilities are addressed by technology and relate to individuals in the organization. Identify the ethical issues for the organization and individuals along with the effect that current or emerging technology has on these issues. Describe how the human resources function uses or might use technology in supporting the organization and individuals in meeting social and ethical responsibilities. Include policies that exist or might exist for this support. Give specific examples in areas such as the following:


· Ownership of intellectual output, privacy of personal information and internal organizational communications, accuracy and quality of information, access to information, flow and content of information, and obligations of organizations created by the use of information

·

Essay Instructions: Social Contract - www.thecontainerstore.com

Describe the social responsibilities that the business (The Container Store) has as an organization. Include information on how these social responsibilities are addressed by technology and relate to individuals in the organization. Identify the ethical issues for the organization and individuals along with the effect that current or emerging technology has on these issues. Describe how the human resources function uses or might use technology in supporting the organization and individuals in meeting social and ethical responsibilities. Include policies that exist or might exist for this support. Give specific examples in areas such as the following:

?Ownership of intellectual output, privacy of personal information and internal organizational communications, accuracy and quality of information, access to information, flow and content of information, and obligations of organizations created by the use of information

Essay Instructions: I want an essay about Rousseau''s
Examine some of the implications of Rousseau''s concept of the General Will in The social Contract. Are they any terms of this contract that you find objectionble? Explain why.
Also give examples.

Essay Instructions: This is the assignment in my professors words:

Thomas Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau have been classified as social contract theorists. Write a five-page double spaced paper that begins by answering the following questions, for each of the theorists listed above: What is the difference between humans who are covered by the contract and those that are not? What moves humans to agree to the contract? What provision is made for enforcing the contract? When is rebellion sanctioned under the contract? If there is no provision that answers one or more of these questions, simply say so. To set up the second part of the assignment, make judgments about fairness of each contract (there are three contracts) That is, are all the people in a society covered? Are there special rules for "special people? And in general, is there any unfairness in the contract?

In John Rawl's "theory of justice" we find an elegant attempt to eliminate the biases of anyone who would formulate principles of justice. This attempt is now known as "the veil of ignorance." Hidden behind the veil are facts that might influenceone in formulating fair principles fo justice. For example, one cannot know ones color, sex, religion, age, gender, physical condition, position in society, or any other facts about oneself that mnight constitute the bias in formulation principles of justice. If you dont know key facts about what you are, you cant afford to slight any group in your formulation (on the ground that you might be in the group that is slighted). The veil,m according to Rawl's, hides one peice of information that may seem odd: ones own conception of good and bad.

First, what is you best guess, as to Rawl's reason for placing ones conception of good and bad behind the veil? As far as i can tell, he does not give a reason for this. The fact that Rawls is bright and probably has a reason, suggests that your guess ought to be, at least, plausible.

Second, can you provide an argument that shows the placing ones view of good and bad behind the veil makes the goal of finding fair principles of justice impossible to attain? This question may b e much more of a challenge that you imagine. I would think it through before commiting yourself to an answer.

These are the books used in out Humannities class:
Locke, Two treatises of government (Hackett)
Rousseau, Meditations (Hackett)