Essay Instructions: This is a request for PART II of a research critique done by your wonderful writer, ?Jenny Jones?. She has written the first half of a critique on a peer reviewed journal article called ?Mexican Americans? Perception of Culturally Competent Care.? I need additional work done on this very same article she has already used. She is completely familiar with the article, so I only want this critique done, if it will be done by Jenny; I love her work ? there is no fluff, only pertinent, high quality, competent work.
I need a 7 page critique. **ONLY CITE THE JOURNAL ARTICLA ITSELF - NO OUTSIDE SOURCES! ** A.P.A format; simply a continuation of what she had written before; same style, same work. The only difference is that there are different ?requirement/questions?. Before Jenny wrote on Method, Lit Review, Samples, etc. With Part II, the following requirement questions must be met. The most important part, as in part I, is that every single item is completely answered (I will submit for a rewrite if each question is not answered). It is also critical that each requirement/question is supported with proof or validation directly from the journal article? spell out all of the why?s, how?s, and what?s. All question in parenthesis must be answered in addition to the initial question.
DATA COLLECTION:
Is date collection focused on human experience? (**Support answer)
Is saturation of the data described? (**Describe it)
DATA ANALYSIS:
Does the researcher describe the strategies used to analyze the data? (**Describe the strategies)
Has the researcher remained true to the data? (** How so?)
Does the researcher understand the procedures used to analyze the data? (** Provide evidence)
CREDIBILITY:
Do the participants recognize the experience as their own? (** Support answer)
AUDIBILITY:
Can the reader follow the thinking of the researcher? (**Support with evidence)
FITTINGNESS:
Are the findings applicable outside the study situation? (** How so, or how not)
CONFIRMABILITY:
Do the findings convey the essence of the experience and include credibility, audibility, and fittingness? (** Explain each aspect)
CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION:
Do the conclusions give the reader a context for the study? (**Spell them out)
Are the recommendations made within the scope of the study? (** What are they?)
Are implications of findings discussed, i.e. for practice, education and research? (** Spell out implications)
Are recommendations for further research stated? (** State them)
RESEARCH UTILIZATION IMPLICATIONS:
Based on personal knowledge and experience, do the results make sense for use in clinical practice? (** Provide support)
Would the intervention/s work in the clinical setting/s with which you are familiar? (** Provide support) and (RELATE TO HIGHLY HISPANIC POPULATION OF LABOR & DELIVERY PATIENTS)
The End.
........................................................................................................................
(Following is the request for Part I... please forward to Jenny Jones so it refreshes her memory regarding the first part of this critique)
Peer Reviewed Journal Article from the ?Western Journal of Nursing Research, 2000
?Mexican Americans? Perceptions of Culturally Competent Care.?
Please only cite the journal article I am faxing to you. Use strict A.P.A. style and cite throughout the paper.
I am faxing in a requirement sheet called, ?RESEARCH CRITIQUE EVALUATION SHEET/QUALITATIVE? There are 15 questions that need to be specifically answered in full. ?Yes or No? answers are not acceptable. There is very much information confined to this one sheet of paper, but it is everything you need. When writing, each topic needs to be outlined. For instance, I?ll use the first question as an example: ?Data Collection; Data collection is/is not focused on the human experience evidenced by?.. using these examples I will lay out to validate my point?, and so on.
It is imperative that each aspect, of each question is thoroughly spelled out. The most important part of answering each of these question is to state WHY & HOW you chose the answer you did; each answer must be validated with facts to back it up. WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, I will most definitely submit for a revision if this ?factual back-up? is not in the content of EACH answer. I thank you very kindly for your attention to this very important detail.
The second MOST CRITICAL part of this research is that all of question segments under the ?support required? column located on the right hand column of the requirement sheet, are fully included in the answer. These are extended clarities of the initial question that need to be met. Thank you for incorporating this.
Obviously, the paper must flow well in the usual, research paper style. (not just question and answer blurbs, but a nice flow in paragraph form)
If uncertain or unclear, please email me immediately. It is very important for me to communicate with you, my needs of this research. Please don?t include/exclude anything without communicating it to me ? I appreciate ongoing communication.
Thank you so very much! Jo?
There are faxes for this order.
